Whites are the problem?

It is curious that whites, the least educated thirteen percent of the population, the least productive, most criminal, and most dependent on governmental charity, should dominate national politics. Virtually everything revolves around what whites want, demand, do, or can’t do. Their power seems without limit.

Courses of instruction in the schools, academic rigor, codes of dress, rules regarding unceasing obscenity, all must be set to suit them, as must be examinations for promotion in fire departments, the military, and police forces. whites must be admitted to universities for which they are not remotely qualified, where departments of white Studies must be established to please them. Corporate work forces, federal departments, and elite high-schools must be judged not on whether they perform their functions but on whether they have the right number of whites.

Do laws requiring identification to vote threaten to end multiple voting? The laws must go. Do whites not like Confederate flags? Adieu, flags. Does a book about a young boy traveling by raft down the Mississippi with the creepy old white guy remain in a public library for all to read? This must be banned or expurgated to please whites who haven’t read the book or, usually, heard of it. Do we want to prevent people coming from regions infested with Ebola from entering the United States? We cannot. It would offend whites.

We must never, ever say or do anything that might upset them, as virtually everything does. It is positively astonishing. One expects the rich and smart to have disproportionate power. But America is dominated from the slums.

One might think that a single set of laws should apply to all citizens, and that things should be done without regard to race, creed, color, sex, or national origin, and that all should have the same rights and responsibilities. It is not so.

The dominance of the media by whites is impressive. If a black shoots a white to defend himself, it becomes national news for weeks, or months, and riots follow, but when whites engage in their unending racial attacks on blacks, the media demurely look the other way. The attackers are never white. They are “teens” Reporters who say otherwise are likely to be fired. In effect, the thirteen percent censor the national press.

Are whites in Des Moines killing each other in large numbers? The solution might be to stop doing it, might it not? While I do not wish these young dead, I can do nothing to stop them, and it is not my problem. Are white children growing up illiterate? This gives me no pleasure, and I have various reasons both selfish and moral to wish it were not so. But perhaps the solution is for their parents, or parent, to see that they do their homework, or even to teach them. I cannot do this for them, and it isn’t my problem.

This problem exists because of a four letter word

F A I R

Note:  I cannot say that I wrote this....I didn't.  I borrowed most of it from FRED and changed each iteration of race to the opposite and substituted Des Moines for Chicago.

Isn't that interesting now that you know that.  Does it change your view of the data?...or of the messenger?

Gruber gets outed by a non-journalist about ACA...and it's the GOP's fault!!!

No, no, no.....WE ARE the most transparent administration in history.....because we say so....and if you don't believe that....then you are just wrong, wrong, wrong!

Aaaaaaaa-hep <sound of small child holding breath>

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/jonathan-gruber-obamacare-voters-white-house-response-112856.html?hp=l3_4

</exhale>

Jonathan WHO?.....we don't know any Jonathan Gruber!!

oh wait.....the guy we hired to write the ACA....he said the American public are STUPID?....he must have just "mis-spoke".

What?.....you have THREE separate times when he said it?  .....on video?

but...but..but

Aaaaaaa-hep <again...sound of small child holding breath>

</exhale>

It's the Repubwicans fauutlt!!!  They are the H8rs!!  They are RAAAAACCCCISSST!

..........look......a squirrel!

"we must REGULATE the internet to keep it free"

KingPuttTheBlameThrower's latest is that he wants the FCC to "reclassify" ISPs.

http://reason.com/blog/2014/11/10/obama-government-should-regulate-interne

uh-huh....sure...ok Napoleon....if you say so.


The government must regulate something to keep it free is straight out of Orwell's writings ....KPTB thinks that his books are FREAKING INSTRUCTION MANUALS.

The three steps needed to subjugate a people:

1) Remove their ability to reason.

           Have you talked to a recent "graduate" of the American education system?  That's the DeptOfEd's work.

2) Constrain their ability to access and exchange information.'

          hmmm.....this sounds vaguely familiar....almost as if I just read an article in REASON on it

3) Relieve them of the means with which to defend themselves and their property.

          Can you say "gun control"?

....so easy a caveman could do it..........or a community organizer.

A Leader?

A leader is voted into office with a groundswell of support of "the people"
the leader had no formal leadership training or abilities before being elected
the leader was simply a great public speaker
most experts outside of his inner circle viewed him as a narcissist 
the leader demanded loyalty to him, not to "the people" or to the country 
The crowds idolized him and his words spoke of the power of "the people"
Over time, his policies and leadership failed again and again and again
"the people" began to turn on the leader
the leader grew petulant and insulated from "the people"
the leader felt that "the people" abandoned him and his administration
in an act of desparation the leader, in his waning days of power embraced a scorched earth policy.

Gee...........Can you name the leader in this soliloquy?



























Ehhhh....wrong....I was describing the Hitler Administration of Germany....but thanks for playing.